You are not logged in.
Hi everyone,
As a new proud Scudo owner, I happily joined this community hoping to get some advice and ensure the best maintenance the car can get. The car is rust-free, despite being a 1996. Besides some normal maintenance stuff, I have a weird problem with speedo readings. When it reads 100 kph, my actual GPS speed is 13% less, 83 kph
. The car runs smallish 195/65r14 tires, but these are only 5% smaller than stock. Has anyone else encountered this problem? What were your solutions or adjustments?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Piotr
Offline
https://sizemywheels.com/tire-size/citr … atch/19d-i
AFAIK 5% discrepancies are okay, your wheels are 20% too small
Offline
83 is 17% less then 100
When all else fails, RTFM - 2006 Expert 2.0 HDI/110
Offline
Speedo in any motor tends to read a tad higher. I notice if doing 70mph i am actually doing 66mph. My bus (different motor) runs 14" wheels as standard and i put on 16" wheels and now when doing 70mph i am actually doing 74/5 so yeah, between a wrong profile tyre or smaller wheel your speedo will be out. I tend to use my sat nav for a speedo when out in the camperbus but thankfully Scotland has switched off all its speed cameras.
Offline
20% too small
Mine are actually 195/60r14s, but still that's 9% less circumference than stock 195/75r14. Anyway, should the odometer be accurate by then, the speedo might be casualy exaggerating. Could you check the difference between gps and speedo readings?

Offline
I did a 600 ish mile trip this weekend mostly on motorways and noticed my 2006 Expert speedo
consistently read 2mph higher than my sat nav
When all else fails, RTFM - 2006 Expert 2.0 HDI/110
Offline
AlvyLad wrote:20% too small
Mine are actually 195/60r14s, but still that's 9% less circumference than stock 195/75r14. Anyway, should the odometer be accurate by then, the speedo might be casualy exaggerating.
Regularly I get showing 79mph when on GPS navigation it's 70
Your maths are WAY OFF the mark
Just get right wheels on and see there from
Last edited by AlvyLad (2024-07-15 20:05:04)
Offline
Your speedo is exagerrating by 13% and I consider that a lot, than's for checking that mate, I'll calm down my suspicions of having the wrong gearbox.
Your maths are WAY OFF the mark
My math is spot on. First number (195) is tyre width, while the second is sidewall height given as percentage of the first value. Sidewall height does not translate proportionally to function of circumference, you must add rim diameter to the equation.
TYRE 1:
195/60r14
width: 195 mm
sidewall height = 0,6 × 195=117 mm
rim diameter: 14" = 14 × 2,54 = 355,6 mm
tyre diameter = 355,6 mm + 2 × 117 mm = 589,6 mm
tyre 1 circumference = diameter * pi = 589,6 × 3,14 = 1851,344 mm
TYRE 2
195/75R14
width= 195 mm
sidewall height = 0.75 × 195= 146.25 mm
14" rim diameter = 355,6 mm
tyre diamenter = 355,6 + 2 × 146,25 mm = 648.1 mm
tyre 2 circumference = diameter * pi = 589,6 × 3,14 = 2035.014 mm
2035.014/1851,344 × 100 = 1,099 – the bigger tyre is 10% bigger than the smaller one.
…or
1851,344/2035.014 × 100 = 0,91 – the smaller is 9% smaller than the big one.
Cheers!
Offline
All this talk of rims and side walls is not irrelevant but does somemwhat
overcomplicate the issue.
Tyres are not all round, they distort (flatten) slightly at the bottom.
I made an Arduino based speedo for a motorbike and found it was simpler and more accurate to ignore rim/tyre sizes and just measure the distance between the wheel centre and ground to get a more realistic running radius.
From this you can calculate the running diameter and circumference.
The wheel sensor gave one pulse per revolution so in my case it was easy to calculate
Distance: number of pulses
Speed: number of pulses in a given time interval.
I dont know how many pulses the Dispatch/Expert/Scudo gearbox pulsers send but
reckon its more than one which should make it more accurate.
If I really wanted to know, I'd probably jack up a wheel and measure them as I turned the wheel one revolution.
You can pick the signal up from the back of the speedo or in my case also from the ECU
or from the wiring harness at any accessible point
When all else fails, RTFM - 2006 Expert 2.0 HDI/110
Offline
My speedo is spot on.
But only when I stop.

Offline
My speedo is spot on.
But only when I stop.
I got mine to an impressive 140mph once before it started being like yours

2000 Citroen Dispatch 1.9TD XUD9 Camper Conversion
1999 Citroen Dispatch 1.9D DW8 Disassembled Camper Conversion
1996 Peugeot 806 1.9TD XUD9 Spare vehicle
1998 Citroen Synergie 1.9TD XUD9 Snapped timing belt
Offline
ohh i did that on mine once when i had it up on axle stands looking for the cause of a vibration. it was a wheel balance issue.. not driveshaft like i thought it was.
- JohnDragonMan
Notice: I have the tendency to void warranties, blow fuses, cause fires, and other fun stuff.
Words of wisdom: Internally rust proof the sills and subframe! both skins!!. There's always user serviceable parts inside. "Oh that shouldn't have happened".
My 2005 Dispatch Camper Project 
Offline
Thanks guys, still looking for bigger wheels. On these smallies and I'm getting 5.2 l/100 km's (fake kilometers).
Offline
5.2 l/100Km is 54mpg
That sounds pretty good to me if your kilometer reading can be relied on.
When all else fails, RTFM - 2006 Expert 2.0 HDI/110
Offline
Yea my best ever was 52MPG (5.4L/100KM) but generally more like 35-45 MPG (8.1 - 6.3 L/100KM)
2000 Citroen Dispatch 1.9TD XUD9 Camper Conversion
1999 Citroen Dispatch 1.9D DW8 Disassembled Camper Conversion
1996 Peugeot 806 1.9TD XUD9 Spare vehicle
1998 Citroen Synergie 1.9TD XUD9 Snapped timing belt
Offline